The Legislative Ranger
HB 175-177
11/24/2026
By: Stephen O’Toole
Childcare standards, border security, and educational access may not seem immediately connected, but HB175, HB176, and HB177—authored by Mary González [D-San Elizario], Ryan Guillen [R-Rio Grande City], and Valoree Swanson [R-Spring], respectively—each address these pivotal issues in ways that could shape Texas’s future. From improving care for children with disabilities to navigating the contentious politics of immigration, and ensuring modern resources for public schools, these bills highlight the diverse challenges facing the state. Let’s break them down to see what’s at stake.
HB175, introduced by Rep. González, focuses on improving childcare services for children with disabilities. This bill proposes a certification process for childcare facilities that comply with standards to integrate children with special needs alongside peers in their developmental group. The certification serves as a mark of quality and eligibility for additional state reimbursements, ranging from $20 to $50 per child monthly, depending on the number and age of children cared for. While budgetary considerations are always critical, this bill appears to offer a meaningful incentive for childcare facilities to enhance inclusivity and support for children with disabilities. Assuming the financial feasibility of this initiative, it represents a thoughtful investment in childcare. I rate this bill a low danger but also a low priority, as its impact is relatively modest compared to broader systemic reforms.
HB176, authored by Rep. Guillen, takes a different tone, addressing border security and immigration. It seeks to codify the term “illegal alien” into the Texas Government Code, a move that feels more like a political statement than a functional necessity, given that existing laws effectively handle undocumented immigration without this definition. The bill also expands the Interstate Compact Provisions, committing Texas to maintaining operational control of the Texas-Mexico border, enforcing federal immigration laws, and providing mutual aid to other states in the compact. While the bill’s objectives might align with some Texans’ views on border security, its vague language raises serious concerns, particularly the phrase “to the greatest extent possible.” This open-ended wording could lead to actions with unclear boundaries, especially when it comes to interactions with foreign governments or the use of state resources.
Families are housed in overcrowded conditions at a US border patrol station on 10 June 2019 in McAllen, Texas, during Trump’s first term. Photograph: Getty Images
Let me step out of my generally neutral stance for a moment, because this is too important to stay quiet. This bill fundamentally lacks compassion and human decency. These are people we’re talking about—individuals fleeing hardship, seeking safety, and trying to provide for their families. While I agree that immigration laws must be respected and enforced, the sweeping language of this bill prioritizes control and exclusion over understanding and humanity. By explicitly committing to protect the border “to the greatest extent possible,” it opens the door to a return of mass detention centers and other morally questionable practices. We can and must do better than this. This bill is not just a policy; it is a statement about who we are as Texans. I believe it is a dangerous step backward, and I urge everyone to fight against it with all urgency. I rate this as highly dangerous and high priority to fight against.
HB177, introduced by Rep. Swanson, shifts focus to education, specifically online library resources for primary and secondary schools. The bill authorizes a commission to procure these resources while detailing a comprehensive framework to ensure their quality and safety. It mandates compliance with State Board of Education standards, adherence to federal internet safety protocols, and sets clear expectations for vendors, including paths for discipline or termination of contracts. Additionally, the bill establishes systems for reporting and addressing complaints about these resources. This thoughtful and well-constructed proposal showcases how legislative processes can create detailed safeguards while addressing specific needs. I rate this bill as low danger and moderate priority to pass, as it offers clear benefits for Texas schools.
From inclusive childcare to controversial immigration measures and educational investments, these bills illustrate the diverse priorities shaping Texas policy. While HB175 and HB177 focus on creating supportive frameworks for children and schools, HB176 presents a more polarizing approach to border security that demands scrutiny. As these bills make their way through the legislative process, their potential to shape Texas’ future will depend on thoughtful debate and public engagement.
Comments