The Legislative Ranger
HB 166-168
11/24/2026
By: Stephen O’Toole
The Texas Legislature continues to present a wide range of legislative proposals, from straightforward protections to polarizing debates. In this article, we examine HB166, HB167, and HB168, authored by Reps. Giovanni Capriglione [R-Keller], Carl Tepper [R-Lubbock], and Jon Rosenthal [D-Cypress], respectively. These bills address critical issues such as safeguarding vulnerable populations from the dangers of controlled substances, controversial attempts to dismantle diversity and inclusion initiatives, and a much-needed reform to end the marriage of minors. Let’s take a closer look at what each of these bills entails and the potential impacts they could have on our state.
HB166 is a straightforward bill that proposes an important update to the Texas Penal Code regarding the endangerment of children, elderly individuals, and disabled persons through exposure to controlled substances. Currently, Section 22.041(c-1) defines endangerment in cases involving methamphetamine. This bill seeks to expand that definition to include fentanyl and its derivatives, reflecting the severity and prevalence of fentanyl-related harm. It does not alter existing penalties but ensures fentanyl is treated with the same level of seriousness as methamphetamine. While there may be some opposition to this expansion, it is likely to receive bipartisan support. Protecting vulnerable populations from the dangers of fentanyl is a commonsense measure. I rate this bill as low danger and moderate priority, as safeguarding those in need is always a cause worth supporting.
HB167, titled the “Ending Institutional Racism Act,” takes a much more contentious approach, seeking to dismantle diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives across all state entities. This divisive bill has sparked a partisan split, with many left-leaning individuals advocating for the continuation of DEI programs and right-leaning individuals favoring their removal. At its core, DEI aims to address systemic inequities and provide opportunities to historically disadvantaged groups. Critics of DEI argue these initiatives create preferential treatment and discrimination, but without them, wealth and privilege often become the sole determining factors of success. Removing DEI programs risks widening the gap between those with resources and those without, undermining progress made in equity and accessibility. While I support the goal of ending institutional racism, I strongly believe this bill fails to achieve that and instead does the opposite.
The provisions of HB167 are sweeping. It prohibits state entities, including public schools, from factoring race, sex, color, ethnicity, gender identity, or sexual orientation into hiring or contracting decisions. It also bans the requirement of training or statements related to these factors, effectively eliminating sexual harassment and diversity training programs. Further, the bill mandates disciplinary action for employees or contractors who violate its provisions and opens the door for lawsuits against entities that utilize DEI practices. Additionally, it removes all statutory considerations for minority-owned or women-owned businesses in state contracts. To me, this bill appears to prioritize maintaining power structures over fostering equity. I cannot support such measures and consider this bill highly dangerous and a top priority to oppose.
HB168 provides a refreshing conclusion to this review, offering a sensible and much-needed reform to Texas law concerning the marriage of minors. Currently, minors under 18 may be granted a marriage license if a court has issued an order removing their disabilities of minority, essentially granting emancipation. This bill proposes to eliminate that exception, ensuring that minors, even those who are emancipated, cannot marry before reaching the age of 18. This change is a necessary step to protect children from entering legally binding adult commitments prematurely. I wholeheartedly support this measure, as there is no justifiable reason to permit children to marry, regardless of their circumstances. I rate this bill as low danger and moderate priority to pass.
These three bills highlight the diverse approaches legislators are taking this session. HB166 focuses on protecting children, the elderly, and disabled individuals from the dangers of fentanyl exposure, while HB167 takes a sweeping aim at dismantling DEI efforts across state entities, sparking considerable concern. HB168 provides a commonsense update to Texas law, safeguarding minors from entering into marriage prematurely. With each passing day, it becomes clear how vital it is to stay vigilant and engaged in understanding the impact of these legislative efforts. The eyes of the Ranger remain upon these bills, ensuring they are not passed without scrutiny.
Kommentare